Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
May 28, 2017, 04:43:03 am

Login with username, password and session length
Team Z Motorsports
Tech Section
* SBFTECH Membership Required *
433490 Posts in 37081 Topics by 9458 Members
Latest Member: Rich351
Search: Advanced search
Advertiser Inquiries
+ SBFTECH.com Experienced Small Block Ford Tech
|-+ Grass Roots Tech
| |-+ Grass Roots Small Block Windsor
| | |-+ 347, stock H/C/I enjoy!
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 Go Down Print
Author Topic: 347, stock H/C/I enjoy!  (Read 49947 times)
Goody_Seven
Big Block
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 700

Location: Utah

« Reply #135 on: October 24, 2009, 04:04:39 pm »

Jayh, put together a 347 with E7s, HO intake, and factory cam and prove your point.  Otherwise a bunch of theories is going to go nowhere with this bunch. Good Luck!
Logged
grabbem88
Self_Deleted
2stroke
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 0


Location: Illinois,sparta...currently perryville,mo.

« Reply #136 on: October 24, 2009, 04:20:44 pm »

Jayh, put together a 347 with E7s, HO intake, and factory cam and prove your point.  Otherwise a bunch of theories is going to go nowhere with this bunch. Good Luck!

what do you mean this bunch?
Logged

those who beg in silence...starve in silence
Outlaw Bill
Adv_SBFTechie
Big Block
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4752


Location: Canton, Michigan

« Reply #137 on: October 24, 2009, 05:57:56 pm »

E-7's, stock intake, stock HO cam on a 347 is just like building a diesel without the power of a diesel. Which in laymans terms is a 600 rpm - 3500 rpm power band.
Logged

www.TeamZmotorsports.net

TeamZmotorsports 25.2 outlaw drag radial stock suspension 1991 Mustang
Thank You to the following for their help
TeamZmotorsports
Marcella Manifolds
Schoneck Composite
Ultimate Converter Concepts


"Stupid is as stupid does", "You can't fix stupid"
"Common sense is not common"
MeanWT99GT
Big Block
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 547


Location: Mass.

« Reply #138 on: December 25, 2009, 12:17:53 pm »

Hrmm. Pic seems dead in the original post. Here it is again.



Logged



"I wouldn't worry about the rod ratio if I were using toothpicks and tomato soup cans...it's irrelevant." - Mark O'Neal
V8Demon
Small Block
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 149


Location: Farmingdale, New York, USA

WWW
« Reply #139 on: January 05, 2010, 11:15:34 pm »

If he's using the stock stuff from a Crown Vic; it's even MORE of a restriction than the H.O. stuff would be as someone stated much earlier in this thread.

Base fuel injected 5.0 non H.O. motors were rated at 150-165 flywheel horsepower and between 265-280 ft-lbs of torque depending on the model it was installed in and the exhaust it received (at least, according to Ford).

These motors were in 86-91 Crown Vics/GrandMarq's/Town Cars; '86-87 Continentals; 86-88 T-birds & Cougars; 1986 MarkVII (except the LSC edition -- 1987 - up were all 5.0 H.O.)

How much more restrictive were the non-H.O. parts?
--50 mm throttle body as opposed to the H.O. 60 mm....The upper intake opening is smaller as well.
--The dreaded E6 heads.
--A cam with under .400" advertised lift and less duration than the stock H.O. cam.
--14 pound injectors fed by a 65 lph fuel pump.

He has a cardomain page:  http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3087533

On this page it states the car sports an F-cam.
This dyno sheet is posted.....



Interesting......Wish I knew what he meant by "stock" although I would venture to say he means as in non-H.O.


I'm guessing that term includes the valve springs.....See here: 
http://www.streetfire.net/video/first-060-recorded-on-a_163421.htm
Logged

--05 Mustang GT-Whippled! - 11's are coming.....
--87 Cougar 5.0 Trick Flow Heads & Intake-Ed Curtis Cam-Many other goodies-3100Lbs...Low 12's
jayh
Big Block
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5471

Location: Buffalo

« Reply #140 on: February 26, 2010, 09:35:50 am »

302 vs 371(still 8.2 deck)
same h/c/i but 1 step in pulley(same boost level)
http://store.realspeedautomotive.com/tuneofweek.html
(2/24/10)

Logged

425" pump gas 6.2@110
Bradone
Big Block
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1070


Location: Lake Wales, FL

« Reply #141 on: March 07, 2010, 07:59:43 am »

Some funny shit!   
Logged

'93 Thunderbird LX 5.0


(click on picture)

93 5.0 Thunderbird LX "Loaded" 81k original at purchase(have maintenance records) Suspension rebuilt front & rear, Solid rubber mm's, Tokico Blues, SCPP 3.5" CAI with box, True Duals (Pypes Bullets 2.5" MVR200R, Magnaflow Resonators 14416), MAC Ceramic Coated 1 5/8 Longtube Headers, FRPP case (IRC) & 3.73 gears, Dynatech MMC driveshaft, Walbro 255lph,  Tru Cool (28k), Cervini hood,Moates QuarterHorse, Innovate LC-1 Wide Band and gauge, J4J1 (94' Cobra) ECM and VMP Slot Blade MAF, '97 TBird Fan, PBR Calipers ////////

15.06@93.48 (4040lb race weight)

To Be Installed: WRGearset (FRPP) AOD w/Art Carr VB (transbrake/electric OD_non-lockup), Ultimate Converter Concepts 9.5" 4100, Hurst V-Matic 2, Camshaft Innovations "Custom" cam & TFS 190 FAC head package by Jay Allen, Holley Systemax II, 75mm TB, 275/50/15 MT D/R's,
V8Demon
Small Block
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 149


Location: Farmingdale, New York, USA

WWW
« Reply #142 on: March 19, 2010, 10:39:18 pm »

302 vs 371(still 8.2 deck)
same h/c/i but 1 step in pulley(same boost level)
http://store.realspeedautomotive.com/tuneofweek.html
(2/24/10)

Dan (Realspeed's owner) is a former Steeda engineer.  Sometimes you gotta work within the customers' constraints.....

Not a justification, just saying....
Logged

--05 Mustang GT-Whippled! - 11's are coming.....
--87 Cougar 5.0 Trick Flow Heads & Intake-Ed Curtis Cam-Many other goodies-3100Lbs...Low 12's
jayh
Big Block
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5471

Location: Buffalo

« Reply #143 on: March 21, 2010, 06:52:10 pm »

I stand by my original comments-
a 347 wont lose power, it will make the same power as 302 but 600rpm sooner, but it will make more torque
the 80's and 90's 351 run the same 125cc intake port and 1.78 intake valve as the 302
Logged

425" pump gas 6.2@110
MeanWT99GT
Big Block
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 547


Location: Mass.

« Reply #144 on: March 21, 2010, 07:19:52 pm »

302 vs 371(still 8.2 deck)
same h/c/i but 1 step in pulley(same boost level)
http://store.realspeedautomotive.com/tuneofweek.html
(2/24/10)



Cubic inches weren't the only thing changed when he went to a 371, so I don't see your point.
Logged



"I wouldn't worry about the rod ratio if I were using toothpicks and tomato soup cans...it's irrelevant." - Mark O'Neal
Nuts
4 Banger
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32

Location:

« Reply #145 on: April 16, 2010, 06:18:10 pm »

Swwet 347
Logged
hcetretsam
4 Banger
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 11

Location: Greensboro, NC

« Reply #146 on: April 25, 2010, 06:04:16 pm »

glorious
Logged
jayh
Big Block
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5471

Location: Buffalo

« Reply #147 on: August 05, 2010, 03:10:30 pm »

from a "catfish" board-



302 vs 351, all else the same
Logged

425" pump gas 6.2@110
289nate
"IL BUONO"
Global Moderator
Big Block
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11403


Location: Los Angeles

« Reply #148 on: August 09, 2010, 01:09:41 pm »

Jayh, is that a computer simulation or an actual pull?
Logged

\'65 fastback pump gas 289, 4.56 gears, and faceplated T5.  11.123 at 122.4
woody
FordStrokers.com-SBFTech.com Owner
Administrator
Big Block
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8590

Location: Chicago
Old School


WWW
« Reply #149 on: August 09, 2010, 01:11:54 pm »

simulator
Logged

331-347 Short Blocks 2099.00 and up
408-418-427 Short Blocks (F4 Roller Blocks Standard) 2399.99 and up
Dart Shorts 4199.00+
D.I.Y Shortblocks 1799.00

FordStrokers.com

Make sure you get your information from the internet gurus that haven't built SHIT, they did sleep at Holiday Inn last night, and we have a few of those gurus right here on this forum. Smiley
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines



408 Stroker