Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
November 22, 2017, 12:13:18 am

Login with username, password and session length
434274 Posts in 37162 Topics by 9479 Members
Latest Member: joerberg
Search: Advanced search
Advertiser Inquiries
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 on: November 21, 2017, 01:46:24 pm 
Started by 347HO - Last post by 289nate
Great job with plan B Dana.  Lose significant weight and a far better point to jack the front end up on. 

 on: November 21, 2017, 11:43:35 am 
Started by 1970_347 - Last post by 1970_347
Haven't bought one yet, yes with the 4R70W.
looks like I am going for a 1996.

The car is still 420 miles away from me, with 7 or 8 projects ahead of it. Still planning right now.

But EFI, auto w O/D, power 4 wheel disc and A/C.

Along with fresh body/paint and new factory style upholstery. Going to make for a great summer cruiser.

 on: November 20, 2017, 04:29:28 pm 
Started by 1970_347 - Last post by Teddyzee
The Explorer harness may be a good choice. If you are using the 4r70w, the Ex ecu will control it.
Almost all connections you want from the engine harness are in the single 42-pin connector. (power, ground, all gauges, etc.)
If it's later than 1997, the PATS system can be disablef in the ECU.

 on: November 20, 2017, 03:13:30 pm 
Started by 1970_347 - Last post by 1970_347

the Explorer can be tuned with EFI live or another tuning software,
all the fox computers are OBDI aren't they?

 on: November 20, 2017, 02:28:11 pm 
Started by 1970_347 - Last post by knucklefux
Depends on the year of the explorer.

If it has a distributor, mustang stuff is a better place to start.

If it's EDIS, you need the explorer stuff if you're planning to keep it distributorless and you want it to be plug & play.  If you don't mind doing some custom wiring, the mustang ecu and harness is the better choice.

 on: November 20, 2017, 12:48:18 pm 
Started by 1970_347 - Last post by juiced coupe
I'd say that a Mustang harness and computer would be a better starting place.

 on: November 20, 2017, 11:29:23 am 
Started by 1970_347 - Last post by 1970_347
Would i be better off modifying a factory explorer harness or buying aftermarket to get the engine trans combo to work in my 70 mustang?

I am buying a running driving 2wd 302 explorer and taking ANYTHING that might be useful in the swap.

(the 347 long block is going to stay, all the rest of the crap is coming off the exploder engine)

 on: November 20, 2017, 07:28:15 am 
Started by TKFD - Last post by TKFD
Speaking to Jim, he reckons just keep with the 4.125, so going with that.

To me, not a large gain to be had vs heavier piston (I'm all into lightweight stuff atm), cutting in cyl wall more, heads may not be up to task (pushed anyway with a 363ci), and CR creeping up (even though might try and aim for 11.5-11.Cool, and pistons take another 3-4 weeks on the build time.

Anyway it was worthy of a discussion

 on: November 19, 2017, 06:15:18 pm 
Started by jimzilla - Last post by jimzilla
I do not know what the offset is on the fox wheels, I have the five lug kit (M-2300-K) from Ford Racing installed so I don't know if that changes the offset measurements.

 on: November 19, 2017, 02:26:29 pm 
Started by 347HO - Last post by LiteEmUp

All parts are pretty much antique now!  Spt at PC

 Spt at PC

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

408 Stroker