Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
March 15, 2010, 05:39:03 am

Login with username, password and session length
245234 Posts in 21309 Topics by 6222 Members
Latest Member: blueovalguy61
Search: Advanced search
Advertiser Inquiries
+ SBFTECH.com Experienced Small Block Ford Tech
|-+ General Tech
| |-+ General Tech
| | |-+ Carburetors Tech
| | | |-+ uneven fuel distribution
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: uneven fuel distribution  (Read 566 times)
tracer64
Stroked Small Block
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 407

Location: Redding, CA

View Profile
« on: June 14, 2007, 01:18:26 pm »

  I pulled the plugs and cut them open, well, didnt really need to though to see the problem because it was pretty obvious.  I'm getting really uneven fuel distribution through the manifold (Vic Jr. )  My front plugs are all clean and look right, but as you go towards the back, especially #4 and #8, they are really rich at the top end, but also at an idle.  I'm currently running my 650 HP with the secondary PV blocked off with 72 primary jets and 80 secondary ones.  I'm gonna drop the secondarys down to 78's to see if that helps.  What do you guys  think?
  Oh, and the metering blocks in this doesnt have the removable IFR so I leaned the low speed AB's....not a good idea  Tongue  Does anyone know of a place that sells metering blocks for the HP series with removable IFR's?

Thanks
Tracy
 
Logged

64 Comet 
  302, C4

89 GT with just some bolt ons
86ssp
Stroked Small Block
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 343


Location: Chicago burbs

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2007, 02:14:47 pm »

Just curious about the pv block off.Why?You shouldn't need the block off.That may be the majority of the problem.I would put the correct pv in and check it.I go mid to high 9's with 2 pv's with good idle and part throttle.
Logged
tracer64
Stroked Small Block
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 407

Location: Redding, CA

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2007, 06:32:00 pm »

I was concerned witht he second PV wanting to open when driving around.    Is your secnd PV set lower than your primary one?

 Thanx!
Tracy
Logged

64 Comet 
  302, C4

89 GT with just some bolt ons
Heater
Small Block
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 185

Location: Wilmington N.C

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 14, 2007, 06:47:18 pm »

Your 650 is jetted richer than my 750  Wonder, Ponder


The last 650 I had was jetted (I think) 68's in the front and 73's in the rear with a block off on the rear and a 6.5 PV on the front.
Logged
Thumper460
Big Block
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1065

Location: Orange Park Fl

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 14, 2007, 07:55:03 pm »

The old HOLLEY rule was.. 4 jet sizes with the secondary P/V and a 10 spread without the P/V.  and then tune from there...

Tpr
Logged

Thumper Of Orange park
" heads winner on PINKS 07-12 "
67 Fastback Mustang ( original owner) bored and stroked 460, Ported PI heads, tunnel ram, Top Loader Liberty geared Trans, 14x32 Goodyears framed tubed blah  blah  blah
86ssp
Stroked Small Block
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 343


Location: Chicago burbs

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2007, 12:02:48 am »

I was concerned witht he second PV wanting to open when driving around.    Is your secnd PV set lower than your primary one?essentially you are driving around with a pv that is open the second you start your motor.I gaurantee thats why your rear cylinders are richer than the front.I run a 2.5 pv on both sides because I have low vacuum with the cam I have.It all comes down to driveability.With out the pv you have to up the Jet to compensate.say you have 10 inwg at adle you would run a 5" pvThe only time that pv would open is when manifold vacuum drops below 5".At part throttle you will most likely have 12-15" at cruise,so theres no chance of the secondaries dumping all that fuel when its not needed.The only people I know that don't run a pv is for track only cars and they only want wot performance.I also know people that run Dominators on the street that still run a pv on both sides.A properly tuned carb will work on the street as well as the track.Putting the pv should help your rear cylinders lean out.What kind of fuel mileage do you get and what mileage do you want?I've seen 8 sec cars that have the driveability of most 13 sec. cars.It all comes down to your tuning capabilities.I can get 13-14mpg with my car with a big cam and alittle over 500hp at the crank.Before I learned all the circuits of the carb and how one circuit can effect another I was getting 3-5mpg and fouling plus after 200 miles.Now it runs as clean as an efi car.Do you have changeable hsab's and  iab's?

 Thanx!
Tracy
Logged
86ssp
Stroked Small Block
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 343


Location: Chicago burbs

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2007, 12:10:14 am »

Let me know how much vacuum you have at idle.What are your cam specs?You shouldnt need to mess with the ifr's.If by chance you do,there is a trick to removing them with wet toilet paper.Then you drill and tap for the removable ones or you can press in blanks and start small and drill larger if needed.You really shouldn't have to go that far.
Logged
tracer64
Stroked Small Block
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 407

Location: Redding, CA

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2007, 12:37:30 am »

How did you quote what I didnt say? Wonder, Ponder Grin

Yes, I have hsab and iab's (which I did try changing and that was bad Tongue)
My cam is 232/232 @ .050 with 108 lsa with .517 lift.  She idles with around 7" so I have a 3.5 in the front.
According to holley, this carb came from the factory with 70 jets square and front and rear pv.
I'll start back there.

Thanks
Logged

64 Comet 
  302, C4

89 GT with just some bolt ons
86ssp
Stroked Small Block
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 343


Location: Chicago burbs

View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2007, 10:42:16 am »

I don't know what happened there ,it put my response in with your quote,wierd.Just a suggestion,put the carb back to the way it came out of the box and start over.jetting,hsab's,iab's,and so on.3.5 pv's is right for your vacuum.70-70pmj's would be a good place to start.You may end up with less jet than the 70-70.Good luck,Scott
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  



Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC



408 Stroker